ArticleScientific reports2025
Deep learning decodes species-specific codon usage signatures in Brassica from coding sequences.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- GGAR: gradient guided adaptive regularization enhances deep learning classification of brassica species using codon usage bias.BMC bioinformatics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Plant species discrimination remains a significant challenge in modern genomics, particularly for closely related species with substantial agricultural importance. Current morphological and molecular approaches often lack the resolution needed for reliable differentiation, creating a pressing need for more sophisticated analytical methods. This study demonstrates how deep learning can address this gap by providing high-accuracy classification of four key Brassica species (B. juncea, B. napus, B. oleracea, and B. rapa) using genomic sequence data. We conducted a systematic comparison of seven neural network architectures, focusing on their ability to discriminate between these closely related species. Based on test data, the Multilayer Perceptron achieved 100% classification accuracy with equally high performance across all evaluation metrics (accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, and MCC). Other architectures, including Leaky ReLU and Dropout Neural Networks, showed near-perfect performance (99.9% accuracy), while the Radial Basis Function Neural Network demonstrated more modest results (74.6% accuracy). These findings reveal important architectural considerations for genomic classification tasks. This work makes three key contributions to the field: (1) it establishes deep learning as a powerful approach for plant species classification, (2) provides comparative performance metrics across multiple network architectures, and (3) demonstrates that whole-genome sequence data can enable highly accurate discrimination without manual feature selection. Our results have immediate applications in crop improvement, biodiversity conservation, and agricultural biotechnology, while the methodology offers a template for similar classification challenges in other taxonomic groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.