ArticleScientific reports2025
Classification of anterior cruciate ligament tears in knee magnetic resonance images using pre-trained model and custom model.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
An anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tear is a prevalent knee injury among athletes, and aged people with osteoporosis are at increased risk for it. For early detection and treatment, precise and rapid identification of ACL tears is significant. A fully automated system that can identify ACL tear is necessary to aid healthcare providers in determining the nature of injuries detected on Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) scans. Two Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN), the pretrained model and the CustomNet model are trained and tested using 581 MRI scans of the knee. Feature extraction is done with the pre-trained ResNet-18 model, and the ISOMAP algorithm is used in the CustomNet model. Linear and nonlinear dimensionality reduction techniques are employed to extract the needed features from the image. For the ResNet-18 model, the accuracy rate ranges between 86% and 92% for various data partitions. After performing PCA, the improved classification rate ranges between 92% and 96.2%. The CustomNet model's accuracy rate ranges from 40 to 70%, 70-90%, 60-70%, and 50-70% for different hyperparameter ensembles. Five-fold cross validation is implemented in CustomNet and it achieved an overall accuracy of 85.6%. These two models demonstrate superior efficiency and accuracy in classifying normal and ACL torn Knee MR images.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.