ArticleInternational journal of impotence research2026
Zero infection protocol in inflatable penile prosthesis surgery: a prospective cohort study using chlorhexidine-alcohol skin preparation and fibrin sealant hemostasis.
Article in International journal of impotence research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Response to Comment on: Zero infection protocol in inflatable penile prosthesis surgery: a prospective cohort study using chlorhexidine-alcohol skin preparation and fibrin sealant hemostasis.International journal of impotence research · 2026Article
- Comment on: Zero infection protocol in inflatable penile prosthesis surgery: a prospective cohort study using chlorhexidine-alcohol skin preparation and fibrin sealant hemostasis.International journal of impotence research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Surgical site infections remain a devastating complication of inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) implantation. We evaluated a novel surgical protocol combining chlorhexidine-alcohol skin preparation with fibrin sealant-mediated hemostasis and no drain placement, hypothesizing that it would reduce infection and hematoma rates. Between January 2020 and December 2023, 103 men underwent primary IPP placement with a protocol of 2% chlorhexidine gluconate/70% isopropyl alcohol (ChloraPrep®) skin antisepsis and intraoperative application of Evicel® fibrin sealant to corporotomy suture lines, subcutaneous tissues, and pump pocket. This group was compared with 115 historical controls who received povidone iodine skin preparation only and routine surgical drains between January 2015 to December 2019. The primary endpoint was IPP infection at 12 months; secondary endpoints included hematoma rate, operative time, length of stay, and patient satisfaction. No infections occurred in the study cohort (0/103), compared to 3.5% (4/115) of controls (p < 0.001). Hematoma incidence was 1.0% (1/103) versus 5.2% (6/115) in controls (p = 0.03). Mean operative time (52.4 ± 13.8 min vs. 58 ± 18 min, p = 0.12) was similar between groups, while same-day discharge rates were higher in the study cohort (94.7 vs. 88.0%, p = 0.03). Combining chlorhexidine-alcohol skin antisepsis with fibrin sealant hemostasis and eliminating drains is a viable option to reduce infections and hematomas in IPP surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41023173What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.