ArticleJournal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association2025
Association of maternal primary language with neurodevelopmental outcomes in high-risk infants.
Article in Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveExamine whether maternal primary language (English or a minoritized language) is associated with differences in infant developmental outcomes. STUDY
designThis retrospective cohort study included 253 infants from a high-risk infant follow-up clinic at a quaternary care center in the U.S. who underwent developmental evaluation at 6, 12, and 24 months corrected age. The Bayley Scales, 3rd and 4th editions, were used to assess development.
resultAt 6- and 12-month visits, the minoritized-language group had significantly lower scores than the English-language group in cognitive, language, and motor domains. By the 24-month visit, the minoritized-language group appeared to catch up in cognitive and motor domains but a significant difference in language skills persisted.
conclusionOur findings indicate disparities in developmental outcomes, particularly in language skills at 24 months corrected age, based on maternal primary language, underscoring the need for further research to inform targeted interventions to address these disparities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.