Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41023168›Full record

ArticleJournal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association2026

Parents' perspectives on the use of statistics to convey uncertainty in the NICU: a qualitative analysis.

Jeanne A Krick, Caitlin E Toffler, Nina Y Zhou, Marin Arnolds

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jeanne A KrickDepartment of Pediatrics, Brooke Army Medical Center, San Antonio, TX, USA. Jeanne.a.krick.mil@health.mil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6461-3776
Caitlin E TofflerDepartment of Pediatrics, Womack Army Medical Center, Fort Bragg, NC, USA.
Nina Y ZhouDepartment of Anesthesiology, Integrated Hospital-Care Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Marin ArnoldsDivision of Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8055-1723

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveExplore NICU parents' perspectives on how statistics are used to communicate prognostic uncertainty. STUDY

designA secondary qualitative grounded theory analysis of semi-structured interviews with parents of current and past NICU patients focusing on their experience with prognostic uncertainty.

resultsParents had varying opinions on the use of statistics. These views depended on many factors, including the motives for sharing statistics, their child's clinical status, their own emotional state, and their relationship with the provider communicating the uncertainty. Depending upon how statistics were utilized, parents felt they could be helpful and desired at times, but also harmful and counterproductive at others. Parents also shared recommendations on how statistics should be utilized in communicating uncertainty.

conclusionThis study reveals an important parental perspective on communication for anyone caring for critically ill neonates. In sharing recommendations for communicating uncertainty with statistics, this study can help providers enhance relationships with parents.

Indexed as

Intensive Care Units, NeonatalParentsProfessional-Family RelationsPrognosisStatistics as TopicCommunicationFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornMaleQualitative ResearchUncertainty

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.