ArticleScientific reports2025
Sustainability in large language model supply chains-insights and recommendations using analysis of utility for affecting factors.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The increasing adoption of Large Language Models (LLMs) has intensified concerns regarding the sustainability of their supply chains, particularly concerning energy consumption, resource utilization, and carbon emissions. To address these concerns, this study proposes a two-step approach. First, a Delphi method is employed to systematically identify the critical factors affecting the sustainability of LLM supply chains. Expert consensus through four rounds of feedback highlights key factors such as Environmental Impact, Computational Efficiency & Resource Optimization, Data Quality & Ethical Considerations, and Social Responsibility & Governance. In the second step, the identified factor's relative importance was calculated using Conjoint Analysis, a statistical technique used to determine how respondents value different factors of a supply chain of LLMs. This prioritization helps formulate strategies to make LLM's supply chain sustainable. The low score for environmental impact suggests a lack of awareness about the sustainability of LLMs' supply chain. The study finds Data Quality and Ethical considerations to be the most important considerations for the respondents. Thus, it provides a framework for implementing sustainable practices in LLMs' supply chains in resource-constrained settings. The results demonstrate the effectiveness of this combined Delphi-Conjoint Analysis approach, providing actionable insights for AI organizations aiming to enhance the sustainability of their LLM operations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.