ArticleScientific reports2025
Nomogram for predicting the success rate of sedation with intranasal dexmedetomidine in paediatric nonpainful diagnostic procedures: a retrospective study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intranasal dexmedetomidine (IN DEX) is being increasingly used for sedation in children undergoing nonpainful diagnostic procedures. Successful procedural sedation facilitates rapid and accurate clinical diagnosis and treatment, thereby improving clinical management efficiency. As the success rate of sedation is influenced by multiple factors, enhancing sedation success, reducing procedure-related risks, and minimizing adverse events are critical clinical priorities. In this study, children aged 12-72 months (1-6 years) who underwent outpatient examinations requiring sedation with IN DEX were included. Data were extracted from the electronic medical records system of the outpatient sedation suite. The training dataset was analysed using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) and multivariable logistic regression to develop a nomogram-based clinical predictive model. Model performance was evaluated via receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, calibration curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA), with validation performed using a separate validation dataset. The developed nomogram, which incorporates napping before sedation, respiratory diseases, snotty before sedation, neurological diseases, sedation history, sedation duration, and sedation method, exhibited moderate predictive value (AUC = 0.833), favourable calibration, and enhanced clinical benefit. This study establishes a clinical prediction nomogram that can assist anaesthesiologists in the outpatient sedation suite to customize and optimize sedation plans, thereby improving the sedation success rate of IN DEX, enhancing the efficiency of nonpainful diagnostic procedures, and providing substantial clinical benefits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.