ArticleScientific reports2025
Evaluation of the quality of rural human settlement in Yunnan-Guizhou-Guangxi adjoining areas and study on pluralistic governance.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Improving rural human settlement quality is a crucial component of promoting global sustainable development. The Yunnan-Guizhou-Guangxi adjoining region, as a typical ecologically fragile and multi-ethnic area in southwest China, faces challenges in rural human settlement governance, including inadequate infrastructure, uneven regional development, and insufficient coordination among multiple subjects. To address these challenges, this study established a rural human settlement environment quality assessment system as its core analytical foundation. The system consists of indicators covering the production-living-ecological (PLES) dimensions and the effectiveness of multi-stakeholder governance, including infrastructure, public services, ecological protection, economic development, and social participation. Data were derived from statistical yearbooks, government reports, and remote-sensing sources, and indicator weights were determined using the entropy method to ensure objectivity and scientific rigor. Based on this framework, the study employs spatial analysis and the geographic detector model to empirically analyze the spatiotemporal evolution characteristics and driving mechanisms of the Yunnan-Guizhou-Guangxi adjoining region from 2015 to 2022, with a particular focus on exploring the interactive effects among the three main subjects: government, market, and society. The results indicate: (1) The government plays a dominant role, but spatial heterogeneity is prominent; (2) Regional coordination and differentiation coexist, with Qiannan, Baise, and Qujing standing out in terms of ecological and living environment improvements, while Wenshan and Zhaotong city lag behind; (3) Information technology has emerged as a new driving force; (4) The synergistic effects of multiple subjects are significant, with government, market, and society interacting extensively. In the future, efforts should be strengthened to promote the shared construction and use of information infrastructure, improve multi-subject collaborative mechanisms, and drive high-quality regional development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.