Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41023061›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

An improved lightweight algorithm for traffic sign detection.

Jia Xu, Yingjie Du, Yuwei Yi, Haojie Du

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jia XuSchool of Automobile and Transportation, Tianjin University of Technology and Education, 300222, Tianjin, China.
Yingjie DuSchool of Electronic Information and Communications, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 430074, Wuhan, China. d202481225@hust.edu.cn.
Yuwei YiSchool of Automobile and Transportation, Tianjin University of Technology and Education, 300222, Tianjin, China.
Haojie DuSchool of Art & Design, Jilin Jianzhu University, 130118, Changchun, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ensuring road safety and advancing autonomous driving technology necessitate the accurate and timely detection of traffic signs. Traffic sign detection faces challenges from complex backgrounds and varying sizes, and substantial computational demands. To tackle these challenges, this study presents YOLO-SAL, a lightweight model for traffic sign detection. Initially, the model adopts and innovates on the SCConv concept by introducing the SCC2f design. This innovation optimizes the conventional convolutional residual block using spatial and channel mechanisms, drastically cut-ting the model's parameters and computational load. Furthermore, the model enhances the Adaptive Feature Pyramid Network (AFPN) by fostering improved interactions across different layers through a progressive feature pyramid network. This enhancement boosts the accuracy of detecting traffic signs across a range of sizes. Additionally, the model incorporates the Long-Sequence Knowledge Attention (LSKA) at the detection layer, leveraging attention principles to refine the model's focus on crucial information. Experimental results demonstrate that, compared with the baseline YOLOv8n model, the proposed YOLO-SAL improves mean Average Precision (mAP) by 4.9%, while reducing model parameters by 13.3% and computational load (FLOPs) by 8.6%, respectively. These advancements highlight the model's ability to meet the needs for fast and accurate traffic sign detection.

Indexed as

Autonomous vehiclesLightweight algorithmObject detection and recognitionYOLO-SAL (an improved algorithm)YOLOv8n

Identifiers

PMID41023061
PMCPMC12479869

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.