ArticleScientific reports2025
Detailed microCT imaging protocol for ex vivo rat stomachs with comparative analysis.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Understanding gastric structure is essential for studying gastrointestinal disorders. While traditional histological analysis focuses on two dimensions, micro-computed tomography (μCT) offers high-resolution three-dimensional (3D) imaging but requires staining for proper visualization of soft tissues. This study presents the first detailed 3D anatomical reconstruction of the rat stomach using μCT, investigating optimal preparation and staining protocols to enhance image quality and ultimately help understand structural-functional relationships in rat stomachs. Fifteen rat stomachs were dissected and prepared through a five-stage process: fixation (2% neutral buffered formalin-NBF), dehydration (graded ethanol), staining (0.75% alcoholic Lugol's solution and 2% alcoholic phosphotungstic acid-PTA), and μCT imaging (SkyScan 1172, Bruker, Belgium). Images were reconstructed using InstaRecon and NRecon software (Bruker, Belgium). Quantitative comparison using signal-to-noise (SNR) and contrast-to-noise (CNR) ratios indicated improved performance with PTA under stain-optimised imaging parameters (CNR: [Formula: see text] vs. [Formula: see text]; SNR: [Formula: see text] vs. [Formula: see text]; p < 40.05), but also revealed tissue shrinkage (21.5% area reduction, 33.1% volume reduction). Fixation duration (3-17 weeks) minimally impacted image quality. Optimal staining duration of 7-9 weeks maximized contrast, while prolonged staining (> 14 weeks) caused tissue tearing. In conclusion, both iodine and PTA stains highlighted useful anatomical features for analysis. Specifically, we recommend 2% NBF fixation for three weeks, followed by 7-9 weeks of PTA staining for high-quality μCT imaging of rat gastric tissue.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.