ArticleScientific reports2025
Integrative genomic and immunoinformatic approach for characterizing HIV-1 pol, vpr, and Nef genes and designing a multi-epitope vaccine.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nanotechnology revolutionizing antimicrobial therapy for superbug infections.Discover nano · 2026Review
- mRNA vaccine design targeting Merkel cell polyomavirus for immunotherapy of Merkel cell carcinoma.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Lung Microbiome Diversity, Infection Dynamics, and Microbe-Mediated Cross-Protection.MicrobiologyOpen · 2026Review
- Nanoparticle-Based Strategies to Combat Multidrug-Resistant Bacteria: Mechanisms, Applications, and Future Perspectives.MicrobiologyOpen · 2026Review
- Nanomedicine in maternal viral infections: advancing prenatal therapies for fetal protection.Discover nano · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The study aims to characterize the Pol, Vpr, and Nef genes, as well as to explore the development of vaccines using computational tools. In this study, blood was extracted from HIV-positive samples, followed by RNA extraction. The RNA was converted into complementary DNA (cDNA) and processed for PCR amplification of the Pol, Vpr, and Nef genes using gene-specific primers. Consensus sequences were generated using CLC software. Additionally, we design an in-silico vaccine by using computational tools. We have successfully sequenced several samples, among them 9 for Pol gene, 5 for Vpr gene, and 8 for Nef gene. The consensus sequences generated from these genes were utilized for vaccine development. We created computational vaccines that include 8 B-cell epitopes, 9 CTL epitopes, and 11 HTL epitopes. The final vaccine construct consists of 555 amino acids, with a molecular weight of 60,226.49 amu. Molecular docking studies indicate that our vaccine construct exhibits a strong binding affinity with the TLR4 receptor. Our HIV vaccine construct covers 96.21% population of the world. Immune stimulation and molecular dynamics simulations demonstrate that our vaccine is stable and elicits a robust immune response. Our study indicates that our vaccine is a potentially strong and stable HIV vaccine for the Pakistani population by utilizing consensus amino acids from the Pol, Vpr, and Nef genes. Further in vivo and in vitro studies are necessary to evaluate the vaccine’s potential impact.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.