Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41023012›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

An experimental approach varying piston geometry for optimization of diesel engine performance and emissions using prioritized clustering approach.

Saad Alshammari, Mohd Zaheen Khan, Zeinebou Yahya, Aiyeshah Alhodaib, Haidar Howari, M Javed Idrisi, Worku Tenna

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Saad AlshammariDepartment of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, College of Engineering, Majmaah Univeristy, 11952, Al Majmaah, Saudi Arabia.
Mohd Zaheen KhanDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Dr. A.P.J. Abdul Kalam Institute of Technology, Tanakpur, Uttarakhand, 262309, India.
Zeinebou YahyaDepartment of Physics, College of Science, Qassim University, 51452, Buraidah, Al-Qassim, Saudi Arabia.
Aiyeshah AlhodaibDepartment of Physics, College of Science, Qassim University, 51452, Buraidah, Al-Qassim, Saudi Arabia.
Haidar HowariDepartment of Physics, College of Science, Qassim University, 51452, Buraidah, Al-Qassim, Saudi Arabia.
M Javed IdrisiDepartment of Sciences, Manav Rachna University, Faridabad, Haryana, 121004, India.
Worku TennaDepartment of Mathematics, College of Natural and Computational Science, Mizan-Tepi University, Mizan Teferi, Ethiopia. workutena@mtu.edu.et.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The world is currently grappling with a severe fuel crisis, driving the urgent search for sustainable and renewable alternatives. Biodiesel stands out as a viable green option due to its biodegradability and lower emissions. However, its global adoption remains limited, primarily due to high conversion costs and low yield. This study investigates the use of sulfonated graphene (SGR) as a catalyst to enhance biodiesel production efficiency. A Petter-AV1 single-cylinder diesel engine was used to evaluate performance (BTE, BSFC) and emissions (NOx, UBHC) through 14 experimental trials, with total uncertainty below 5%, confirming test reliability. Given the complex interactions among these parameters, stemming from nonlinear combustion behavior and physicochemical dependencies, a hybrid optimization method is applied, integrating Pearson-based priority analysis with k-means machine learning clustering. AHP-k-means is specifically selected due to its strength in addressing the multi-dimensional complexity of biodiesel properties. Its precision in prioritizing influencing factors and clustering performance-emission outcomes makes it ideal for optimizing biodiesel blends in diesel engine setup. Sulfonated graphene effectively enhances the transesterification process, achieving a high biodiesel yield of 94%. Nanoparticle concentration had the most significant effect, showing strong positive correlation with BTE (r = 0.6247) and strong negative correlation with BSFC (r = - 0.5802) and UBHC (r = - 0.6634), though it increased NOx (r = 0.6168). Among the input parameters, nanoparticle concentration held the highest priority (48%), followed by blend percentage (27%). The optimal trial (Trial 13) featured 40% biodiesel blend, 20 ppm NPC, 100% load, and a toroidal piston head, resulting in BTE of 42.30%, BSFC of 0.34 kJ/kWh, NOx at 620.18 ppm, and UBHC at 39.60 ppm. These findings highlight the promising role of SGR in improving biodiesel yield and its potential application in converting wastewater treatment plants into sustainable fuels.

Indexed as

BiofuelsDiesel engineEmission analysisEnergy efficiencyMachine learningPerformance

Identifiers

PMID41023012
PMCPMC12480498

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.