Observational studyScientific reports2025
Comparison of medic and 3D DESS with routine MRI to assess the diagnostic efficacy in symptomatic temporomandibular disorders: a cross sectional observational study.
Observational study in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- TMJ MRI structural features and horizontal condylar angle across a seven-type disc-condyle classification.BMC oral health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Temporomandibular disorders (TMDs) involve functional and structural disturbances of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ), often requiring early imaging for effective management. This study compared the diagnostic performance of three MRI sequences-PDFSE, MEDIC, and 3D DESS-in evaluating early intra-articular changes in 108 TMJs of symptomatic patients. Key parameters assessed included disc morphology, joint effusion, bone marrow status, and image quality. PD-FSE showed the highest signal intensity ratios for the mandibular condyle, disc, and lateral pterygoid muscle, indicating superior contrast. MEDIC provided the best image quality and demonstrated the highest sensitivity for detecting bone marrow edema. Although PD-FSE detected moderate joint effusions most frequently, the difference was not statistically significant. Inter-observer agreement across all sequences was excellent. Overall, PD-FSE offered superior contrast, while MEDIC enhanced detection of subtle bone and fluid changes. A combined approach using both sequences may improve early diagnosis and clinical decision-making in TMD management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.