Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41022996›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Error-driven intralimb and interlimb adaptations under asymmetric treadmill and cueing conditions.

Adila Hoque, Seok Hun Kim, Kyle B Reed

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Adila HoqueDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA. adila1@usf.edu.
Seok Hun KimDepartment of Physical Therapy, Dr. Kiran Patel College of Osteopathic Medicine, Nova Southeastern University, Tampa, FL, USA.
Kyle B ReedDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rhythmic auditory cueing is commonly used in gait rehabilitation for post-stroke and Parkinson's disease populations, typically improving functional metrics such as walking speed and cadence. In addition, the timing of the cues may be adjusted to deliver asymmetric cues that mimic the effects observed with split-belt treadmill training, where the left and right belt speeds move at different speeds. This study investigates spatiotemporal modifications to asymmetric rhythmic auditory cues by analyzing changes within (intralimb) and between (interlimb) legs under asymmetric mechanical (split-belt treadmill) and instructional (asymmetric rhythmic cues) perturbations. We also examine how timing errors (differences between assigned and actual step durations) affect step velocity under combined treadmill and cueing conditions. We evaluated the effects of limb laterality, rhythmic cue adaptability, and experimental stage on these measures, and correlated timing error with gait harmony (a measure associated with step velocity). Findings revealed that individuals exhibit distinct cue-specific error correction strategies based on adaptability level-from predictive central timing mechanisms to feedback-driven or subcortically mediated responses, reinforcing the need to tailor rhythmic interventions to motor-cognitive profiles. These insights support the development of personalized gait rehabilitation approaches that account for an individual's rhythm processing capacity, cueing responsiveness, and underlying motor learning mechanisms.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PhysiologicalCuesAdultAgedExercise TestFemaleGaitHumansMaleMiddle AgedStroke RehabilitationWalkingAsymmetric gaitGait harmonyMotor-cognitive interventionsRhythmic cueingSplit-belt treadmillTiming error

Identifiers

PMID41022996
PMCPMC12479849

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.