Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41022994›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Perceiving intimidation through kinematic cues in men's gait.

K McCarty, C Leslie, A Anguera de la Rosa, T K Saxton, P L Cornelissen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

K McCartyDepartment of Psychology, Northumbria University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.
C LeslieDepartment of Social Sciences, Northumbria University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.
A Anguera de la RosaDepartment of Psychology, Northumbria University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.
T K SaxtonDepartment of Psychology, Northumbria University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.
P L CornelissenDepartment of Psychology, Northumbria University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK. piers.cornelissen@northumbria.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Male intrasexual competition has shaped the evolution of sexually dimorphic traits, influencing both physical and cognitive mechanisms for assessing physical dominance and formidability. While previous research has examined static visual cues such as height and upper body musculature to male formidability, the role of dynamic cues remains underexplored. We used 3D motion capture to investigate biomechanical markers that drive perceptions of male physical dominance. Fifty-two male participants' walking gaits were recorded, and their upper-body strength, anthropometric measures, and self-reported aggression were assessed. A separate group of 137 raters evaluated the dominance of these walking patterns. Results revealed that one dynamic cue, lateral torso oscillation (sway) and one postural cue, shoulder abduction, were correlated with physical dominance as well as with anthropometric measures (e.g., height, chest size) and trait aggression scores. A linear mixed-effects model demonstrated that sway, shoulder abduction and body size/strength all contributed independently to predicting physical dominance, suggesting that gait dynamics provide robust social signals beyond static morphology. These findings highlight the adaptive significance of human locomotion in competitive social interactions. Future research should investigate the potential for a trade-off between static and dynamic cues to dominance, particularly in situations where static cues might be obscured.

Indexed as

AggressionGaitAdultBiomechanical PhenomenaCuesHumansMaleSocial DominanceWalkingYoung AdultBiomechanicsDynamic cuesFormidabilityGait analysisPhysical dominanceSocial perceptionTrait aggression

Identifiers

PMID41022994
PMCPMC12480651

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.