ArticleScientific reports2025
Survey on Chinese users' acceptance of AI assistants: expanding technology acceptance model.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
With the rapid development of artificial intelligence technology, AI assistants are gradually penetrating daily life and work. However, the internal mechanism of their user acceptance still needs to be further explored. Therefore, this study is based on the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), introducing three external variables, Aesthetic Pleasure (AP), Information Quality (IQ), and AI Skills (AIS), to construct an extended model to explore the acceptance of AI assistants by Chinese users and its influencing factors. The results showed that aesthetic pleasure, information quality, and AI skills significantly affect perceived usefulness and ease of use by analyzing questionnaire survey data from 363 Chinese users and using structural equation modeling (CB-SEM) to validate hypotheses. AI skills, perceived usefulness, and perceived ease of use significantly affect behavioral intention. Notably, aesthetic pleasure and information quality do not affect behavioral intention. This study provides theoretical support for the design of AI assistants, helping designers and developers understand users' needs and preferences to better design AI assistants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.