ArticleScientific reports2025
Real world outcomes of faricimab in treatment resistant neovascular age-related macular degeneration among Asian patients.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- From Trials to Treatment: Current Evidence Supporting Faricimab Use in nAMD and DME.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Aflibercept and Faricimab Equipotently Restore Endothelial Barrier Function.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To describe the real-world efficacy and safety outcome measurements of faricimab use in treatment-resistant neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) in a cohort of Asian patients. A tertiary hospital in central Singapore serving a resident population of approximately 1.5 million. Retrospective chart review of patients with nAMD previously treated using intravitreal bevacizumab, ranibizumab or aflibercept and were switched to faricimab between August 2022 to August 2023. Patients were switched to faricimab due to either the ineffectiveness of prior anti-VEGF agents to achieve retinal dryness or inadequate treatment intervals. Only patients who had at least one follow-up visit after switching to faricimab were included in the analysis. Primary outcome measures included best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in ETDRS letter score and Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) measurements including central subfield thickness (CST), presence or absence of intraretinal fluid (IRF), subretinal fluid (SRF), intraretinal cysts and subretinal hyperreflective material (SRHM). Secondary outcome measures included adverse events and treatment history such as the mean number of injections and treatment intervals. One hundred and nineteen eyes (117 patients) with a mean age of 75.6 (58-93 years) were switched to faricimab and included in the analysis. Of these, 55 (47.0%) were males. The mean number of intravitreal anti-VEGF injections received was 28.2 ± 19.5 prior to switching to faricimab. The majority of these were switched from ranibizumab (26.1%) and aflibercept (73.1%). At baseline, BCVA was 62.7 ± 19.9 letter and mean CST on OCT was 352.5 μm ± 128.5 μm. Only 11 (9.2%) eyes were dry on OCT at baseline: 39.5% had presence of IRF, 72.3% had presence of SRF, 41.2% had presence of intraretinal cysts, and 50.4% had presence of SRHM. After switching to faricimab, the eyes received a mean of 4.8 ± 2.7 faricimab injections up to the time of data cut-off. At last visit, the mean BCVA maintained at 60.3 ± 20.7 letter and mean CST reduction was - 41.6 μm (p < 0.001). Compared to baseline, 49 (41.2%) were dry on OCT: 24.4% had presence of IRF, 41.2% had presence of SRF, 29.4% had presence of intraretinal cysts, and 48.7% had presence of SRHM (all p < 0.001). No serious ocular adverse events were reported. Switching patients with nAMD to faricimab in real-world scenarios has demonstrated the ability to maintain vision while adding anatomical gains in those previously resistant to alternative anti-VEGF therapy. Faricimab is well-tolerated with no serious ocular adverse events reported.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.