ArticleScientific reports2025
Ultraviolet A absorption coefficients of contact lenses for use in contact lens assisted corneal crosslinking for thin Corneas.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to compare the UVA absorption coefficients of multiple hydrogel and silicone hydrogel lenses (with and without pre-soaking in riboflavin) to those reported for the human cornea. The study also assessed the effect of different contact lens pre-soak times (in riboflavin) on the measured UVA absorption coefficients. Five lenses each of Omafilcon A, Nelfilcon A and Somofilcon A were pre-soaked in riboflavin and UVA absorption was assessed. Six lenses each of two hydrogel (Omafilcon A and Nelfilcon A) and three silicone hydrogel (Comfilcon A, Lotrafilcon A, and Samfilcon A) lenses were assessed before and after a 30-minute soak in riboflavin. One-way ANOVA was used for all comparisons. Absorption coefficients, without riboflavin, for Omafilcon A, Nelfilcon A and Somofilcon A were: 8.6 ± 1.2 cm
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.