Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41022953›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Multi-objective optimization for dynamic logistics scheduling based on hierarchical deep reinforcement learning.

Jiantao Su, Saohua Dong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jiantao SuCollege of Mechanical, University of Science and Technology, Beijing, 100083, China. cassjt@126.com.
Saohua DongCollege of Mechanical, University of Science and Technology, Beijing, 100083, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper proposes a novel hierarchical deep reinforcement learning framework for multi-objective optimization of dynamic logistics scheduling problems. Traditional optimization methods and conventional reinforcement learning approaches struggle with the complexity, uncertainty, and competing objectives inherent in modern logistics operations. Our approach integrates temporal abstraction through a two-level architecture comprising high-level policy networks for strategic planning and low-level execution networks for tactical implementation. We design a Pareto-optimal reward mechanism with adaptive weighting to balance time efficiency, cost control, and service quality objectives while addressing the challenges of sparse rewards and sample efficiency. Extensive experiments on diverse logistics datasets demonstrate the superiority of our approach, achieving 18.4% improvement in service quality, 15.2% reduction in order fulfillment time, and 7.8% decrease in operational costs compared to state-of-the-art methods. Visual analyses and case studies illustrate the framework's ability to generate high-quality Pareto-optimal solutions that effectively balance competing objectives. The proposed framework exhibits particular advantages in dynamic environments with real-time disruptions, maintaining strategic coherence while enabling tactical adaptability with near real-time decision-making capabilities.

Indexed as

Deep learningDynamic decision-makingHierarchical reinforcement learningLogistics schedulingMulti-objective optimizationPareto optimality

Identifiers

PMID41022953
PMCPMC12479806

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.