ArticleScientific reports2025
Impact of shared spaces and daily routines on shared microbiome.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Classification of the tongue microbiota and its associations with lifestyle factors and health status.NPJ biofilms and microbiomes · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The diversity of microbial communities on the fingers and in the oral cavity may vary based on the regularity of shared daily routines. Participants who frequented various shared spaces, including daycare centers, offices, senior centers, universities, and mosques, provided oral and finger-swab samples. Samples from individuals who regularly shared spaces showed a high similarity in the diversity of finger microbial communities, highlighting the significant role of environmental exposure. Participants associated with shared spaces had low intra-group variation, indicating consistent microbial exchange. In contrast, oral microbiomes were less affected by regular shared spaces and were more influenced by factors such as diet, hygiene, and demographic characteristics. Participants in the irregularly shared space group showed higher levels of similarity in oral microbiomes, with notable differences in microbial diversity among groups based on their unique cultural, dietary, and hygienic practices. Overall, this study demonstrated that regular interactions within specific environments can significantly shape microbial profiles, particularly on the skin, whereas oral microbiomes are more stable and influenced by broader lifestyle factors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.