Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41022932›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Clinical application of deep learning for enhanced multistage caries detection in panoramic radiographs.

Suchaya Pornprasertsuk-Damrongsri, Sirawich Vachmanus, Dhanaporn Papasratorn, Jira Kitisubkanchana, Sarunya Chaikantha, Raweewan Arayasantiparb, Pattanasak Mongkolwat

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Suchaya Pornprasertsuk-DamrongsriDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Mahidol University, 6, Yothi Road, Ratchathewi District, Bangkok, 10400, Thailand. suchaya.drs@mahidol.ac.th.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3813-4672
Sirawich Vachmanus *Faculty of Information and Communication Technology, Mahidol University, Nakhon Pathom, 73170, Thailand.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6472-8426
Dhanaporn PapasratornDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Mahidol University, 6, Yothi Road, Ratchathewi District, Bangkok, 10400, Thailand.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9952-6704
Jira KitisubkanchanaDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Mahidol University, 6, Yothi Road, Ratchathewi District, Bangkok, 10400, Thailand.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0020-863X
Sarunya ChaikanthaDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Mahidol University, 6, Yothi Road, Ratchathewi District, Bangkok, 10400, Thailand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-8544-9191
Raweewan ArayasantiparbDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Mahidol University, 6, Yothi Road, Ratchathewi District, Bangkok, 10400, Thailand.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6441-2272
Pattanasak MongkolwatFaculty of Information and Communication Technology, Mahidol University, Nakhon Pathom, 73170, Thailand.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7905-1024

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The detection of dental caries is typically overlooked on panoramic radiographs. This study aims to leverage deep learning to identify multistage caries on panoramic radiographs. The panoramic radiographs were confirmed with the gold standard bitewing radiographs to create a reliable ground truth. The dataset of 500 panoramic radiographs with corresponding bitewing confirmations was labelled by an experienced and calibrated radiologist for 1,792 caries from 14,997 teeth. The annotations were stored using the annotation and image markup standard to ensure consistency and reliability. The deep learning system employed a two-model approach: YOLOv5 for tooth detection and Attention U-Net for segmenting caries. The system achieved impressive results, demonstrating strong agreement with dentists for both caries counts and classifications (enamel, dentine, and pulp). However, some discrepancies exist, particularly in underestimating enamel caries. While the model occasionally overpredicts caries in healthy teeth (false positive), it prioritizes minimizing missed lesions (false negative), achieving a high recall of 0.96. Overall performance surpasses previously reported values, with an F1-score of 0.85 and an accuracy of 0.93 for caries segmentation in posterior teeth. The deep learning approach demonstrates promising potential to aid dentists in caries diagnosis, treatment planning, and dental education.

Indexed as

Deep LearningDental CariesRadiography, PanoramicFemaleHumansReproducibility of ResultsArtificial intelligenceCaries classificationDeep learningDental cariesPanoramic radiographSegmentation

Identifiers

PMID41022932
PMCPMC12480035

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.