Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41022899›Full record

ArticleScientific data2025

A Reference DNA Barcode Library for UK Fungi associated with Bark and Ambrosia Beetles.

Angelina Ceballos-Escalera, Theo Llewellyn, John Richards, Daegan Inward, Alfried Vogler

Abstract readDataset
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific data, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Angelina Ceballos-Escalera *Leverhulme Centre for the Holobiont, Department of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, Silwood Park Campus, Ascot, Berkshire, SL5 7PY, UK.
Theo Llewellyn *Leverhulme Centre for the Holobiont, Department of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, Silwood Park Campus, Ascot, Berkshire, SL5 7PY, UK. t.llewellyn19@imperial.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-8465-8031
John RichardsLeverhulme Centre for the Holobiont, Department of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, Silwood Park Campus, Ascot, Berkshire, SL5 7PY, UK.
Daegan InwardForest Research, Alice Holt Research Station, Farnham, Surrey, GU10 4LH, UK.
Alfried VoglerLeverhulme Centre for the Holobiont, Department of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, Silwood Park Campus, Ascot, Berkshire, SL5 7PY, UK.

Funding

Leverhulme Trust Leverhulme Centre for the Holobiont
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bark and ambrosia beetles are ecologically important and widespread forest organisms. While flying between host plants and tunnelling into bark, they vector a high diversity of plant and insect-associated fungi within and between forests. These fungal communities live under the bark and rarely produce visible spore-bearing structures, making them difficult to sample and identify at scale. By combining passive insect trapping across the United Kingdom with individual beetle metabarcoding, we generated a reference DNA barcode library for fungi associated with over 1000 beetles, representing 25 native weevil species in the subfamily Scolytinae (Curculionidae). Sampling sites span longitudinal and latitudinal gradients, multiple forest types, and both natural and plantation forests. We use state-of-the-art fungal ITS2 OTU clustering and identification, resulting in 5274 identified fungal OTUs. This fungal diversity data can be used alongside extensive site and sample metadata to explore geographic and ecological biodiversity patterns. As these associations can be highly invasive and damaging, this resource provides a baseline to understand current fungal communities and monitor future changes.

Indexed as

ColeopteraDNA Barcoding, TaxonomicFungiWeevilsAnimalsBiodiversityForestsGene LibraryPlant BarkUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID41022899
PMCPMC12480477

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.