Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41022875›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Differential impacts of regenerative agriculture practices on soil organic carbon: a meta-analysis of studies from India.

Mukund Patil, Cuba Perumal, Pushpajeet Choudhari, Rajesh Pasumarthi, Gajanan Sawargaonkar, Ramesh Singh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mukund PatilInternational Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics, Patancheru, India. mukund.patil@icrisat.org.
Cuba PerumalInternational Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics, Patancheru, India.
Pushpajeet ChoudhariInternational Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics, Patancheru, India.
Rajesh PasumarthiInternational Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics, Patancheru, India.
Gajanan SawargaonkarInternational Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics, Patancheru, India.
Ramesh SinghInternational Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics, Patancheru, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Regenerative agriculture (RA) is heralded as a transformative solution to combat climate change, enhance biodiversity, and improve soil health. However, its effectiveness across diverse agro-climatic contexts remains underexplored. This meta-analysis synthesizes results from 147 peer-reviewed studies across India's major agro-ecological and agro-climatic regions. Using a random-effects model, we estimate the soil organic carbon (SOC) change attributable to a suite of RA practices, including organic amendments (farmyard manure, green manure, compost, and biochar), conservation tillage, crop residue retention, and fertilizer management. Biochar application resulted in the highest SOC gain, followed by farmyard manure, green manure, compost, and fertilizer management. Conservation tillage and crop residue retention demonstrated moderate, yet consistent, carbon benefits across time scales. The SOC gains were most significant over durations exceeding five years and varied across agro-ecological regions, with semi-arid and sub-humid regions showing particularly strong responses. The findings affirm that RA practices effectively sequester carbon, particularly when applied over longer durations and in regionally adapted combinations.

Indexed as

Carbon sequestrationCompostCrop residueFYMMeta-analysisRegenerative agricultureTillage

Identifiers

PMID41022875
PMCPMC12480671

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.