ArticleScientific reports2025
Transformer based spinal vertebrae localization and scoliosis curvature classification.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Human spine is a complex structure that plays a vital role in the movement, protection, and support of the body so it is very important to follow proper spine bio-mechanics to avoid any unwanted effect on body. Spinal diseases can cause compression or pulling the nerve roots, which can lead to radicular symptoms like back pain or leg pain. On the other hand, it may cause deformities which are most common at C4-C7 and L4-S1 level. Localization of vertebra bones that make up the spine is key in spinal disease diagnosis such as calculating cobb angles, shape detection, detecting vertebra fractures and other abnormalities. In this paper, we have covered four modules, first, for the vertebrae localization we used detection transformer to localize 68 corner points, Secondly, we have used a SegFormer to do the segmentation of the spine. Thirdly, center profile of the spine was generated using center point technique for localization and morphological thinning for segmentation. In the final step of shape analysis process, we take the profile of spine to calculates the features and classify the data into normal, Single-bend (C-shaped) and Double bend (S-shaped) spine. DETR gives mAP value of 0.96 at 0.5 IOU threshold and SegFormer achieves a dice score of 0.93 in segmenting spinal images. For the classification of the data, we have used different classifier (SVM, RF, KNN and NB). We have used three features from both Segformer and DETR techniques. Features acquired from localization technique (DETR) and Segmentation (SegFormer) yield better accuracy when using a random forest classifier. Random forest performs best for AASCE MICCAI 2019 dataset with an accuracy of 98.3%. The MAE 2.7 and SMAPE 4.37 of our proposed approach is slightly good than that of other methodologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.