ArticleScientific reports2025
Superior canal dehiscence syndrome induces canal-specific kinematic adaptations during locomotion.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Superior canal dehiscence syndrome (SCDS) is caused by a pathological 'third window' in the inner ear that selectively impairs superior semicircular canal function. Here we examined locomotion in individuals with SCDS to explore whether this canal-specific vestibular disruption leads to distinctive changes in movement during natural, overground walking. Participants with unilateral SCDS and healthy controls completed a series of ten walking tasks of varying difficulty (i.e., Functional Gait Assessment), while wearing inertial sensors on the head, trunk, waist, and limbs to capture segment-specific body movements. Participants with SCDS showed significantly lower FGA scores and slower gait cycles, as well as movement changes primarily in the vertical and pitch planes. In particular, quantitative analysis of kinematics revealed reduced vertical head acceleration with increased variability during complex tasks, diminished head pitch velocity, and reduced ipsi-lesional ankle pitch velocity and vertical acceleration. Importantly, these alterations were most pronounced during challenging tasks with limited visual feedback and could not be explained by slower gait speed alone. Overall, our findings suggest that disruption of a single semicircular canal can elicit compensatory movement strategies that reduce stimulation of the affected canal, thereby offering new insight into canal-specific contributions to everyday mobility and informing targeted vestibular rehabilitation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.