Trial reportNature communications2025
Immunogenicity of fractional and standard dose COVID-19 vaccine boosters among healthy adults in Indonesia: twenty four month follow-up from a randomised controlled trial.
Trial report in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cellular immune responses 12 months after fractional or standard dose BNT162b2 booster vaccination in Mongolian adults.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Trial
- Fractional BNT162b2 boosters induce durable immune responses after non-mRNA priming in Mongolia: a randomised controlled trial.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
28 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although many high-income countries have regular COVID-19 vaccine booster schedules, there are limited data on the protective effects of some heterologous booster combinations. This observational follow-up study of a double blind randomised controlled parallel group trial evaluates long-term immunogenicity, safety and breakthrough infections to 24 months after booster doses (fractional or standard Pfizer BNT162b2, fractional or standard AstraZeneca ChAdOx1, and standard dose CoronaVac) following CoronaVac and AstraZeneca primary series in healthy adults in Indonesia. Of 1,289 trial participants, 962 (75%) complete follow-up to 24 months. Among CoronaVac-primed participants, responses are lower for fractional than standard dose Pfizer at 28 days (binding IgG geometric mean ratio: 0.75, 95% CI: 0.63-0.90), but differences diminish by 12 and 24 months. AstraZeneca-primed participants have lower initial responses than CoronaVac-primed participants following Pfizer and AstraZeneca boosters. Breakthrough infections occurred in >40% of participants between six and 12 months, and in >35% between 12 and 24 months. Fractional and standard doses of AstraZeneca and Pfizer among CoronaVac-primed or AstraZeneca-primed participants, boost immune responses to 24 months. However, fractional doses elicit lower initial responses than standard doses. These findings provide important information for booster strategies, especially in populations primed with inactivated vaccines. Funding: Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI). Trial registration: ina-registry.org , INA-GO0HLGB.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.