Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41022807›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Characteristics of vicarious touch reports in a general population.

Sophie Smit, Matthew J Crossley, Regine Zopf, Anina N Rich

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Touching Emotions: How Touch Shapes Facial Emotional Processing Among Adolescents and Young Adults.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  3. The Validated Touch-Video Database.Behavior research methods · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sophie SmitSchool of Psychological Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia. sophie.smit@mq.edu.au.
Matthew J CrossleySchool of Psychological Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.
Regine ZopfSchool of Psychological Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.
Anina N RichSchool of Psychological Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.

Funding

Australian Research Council FT230100119
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vicarious touch broadly refers to sensory, neural, or affective responses to observing touch on another person. In this study, we focused on the conscious experience of these sensations. We collected vicarious touch reports from 422 undergraduate students who viewed videos from the validated touch-video database (VTD), a stimulus set systematically rated for hedonic qualities, arousal, and perceived threat levels. A surprisingly large majority (84%) of participants reported vicarious sensations such as touch, tingling, pressure, and pain, predominantly matched to the location of touch on the hands observed in the videos. Contrary to previous studies, we found that vicarious touch was more prevalent in women than men. Additionally, while earlier research suggested a correlation between vicarious sensations and emotional reactivity, our data did not support this relationship. The nature and intensity of reported sensations varied strongly with the emotional content of the videos: pleasant touches often evoked ticklish or warm sensations, while unpleasant touches often resulted in pain or pressure. Participants regularly described their sensations as either pleasant or unpleasant, indicating that the affective qualities of observed touch were mirrored in their experiences. Subjective arousal and threat ratings taken from the VTD for each video strongly correlated with the prevalence and intensity of vicarious touch measured here, with painful, highly arousing touches eliciting the strongest responses. Even observing touch on a non-human object occasionally triggered similar vicarious sensations. Using a new clustering approach, we identified three distinct profiles of vicarious touch, each characterised by unique sensory experiences, variations in the localisation and intensity of sensations, and differences in responses to observing touch on another person versus an object. Overall, our results challenge the traditional view that conscious vicarious touch experiences are a rare phenomenon and underscore the diversity of vicarious sensory perception.

Indexed as

TouchTouch PerceptionAdolescentAdultArousalEmotionsFemaleHumansMaleYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID41022807
PMCPMC12480766

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.