ArticleScientific reports2025
Extraction of PEM fuel cell variables based on modified hippopotamus optimization algorithm.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- An enhanced Draco lizard optimizer for accurate parameter extraction of proton exchange membrane fuel cells.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Parameter identification of a PEMFC is the process of using optimization approaches to determine the best unknown variables suitable for the development of a precision fuel cell performance forecasting model. Since these variables may not always be mentioned in the manufacturer's datasheet, identifying them is essential to accurately forecasting and evaluating the fuel cell's performance. Like many swarm-based algorithms, the Hippopotamus Optimization (HO) algorithm is prone to getting trapped in local optima, which can hinder its ability to identify global optimal solutions. This limitation becomes particularly pronounced in complex, constrained optimization problems. Additionally, the algorithm's reliance on previous solutions for updating positions often leads to slow convergence. To address these challenges, a modified version of the HO algorithm (MHO) is proposed that integrates two innovative strategies: a novel exploitation mechanism and an Enhanced Solution Quality method. Five distinct optimization techniques; the MHO algorithm, the Grey Wolf Optimizer (GWO), the HO algorithm, the Chimp Optimization Algorithm (ChOA), and the sine cosine algorithm (SCA) are used to calculate the six unknown parameters of a PEMFC. The sum square error (SSE) between the estimated and measured cell voltages is the fitness function that needs to be minimized during optimization, and these six parameters act as choice variables. HO, GWO, SCA, and ChOA came after the MHO algorithm, which produced an SSE of 1.748996055. Because MHO accurately anticipated the performance of the fuel cell, it is suitable for the development of digital twins for fuel-cell applications and control systems for the automobile industry. Furthermore, it was demonstrated that MHO converged faster than the other techniques studied.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.