ArticleScientific reports2025
Comparison of glucose/potassium ratio and revised trauma score in predicting mortality in patients with isolated blunt head trauma.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Stress index (glucose-to-potassium ratio) as a predictor of outcome in traumatic brain injury: systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Pooled it
- Association of Serum Glucose/Potassium Ratio with Injury Severity and Transfusion Requirements in Traumatic Pelvic Fractures: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Clinical characteristics and socioeconomic determinants of unintentional childhood injuries: An emergency department perspective.Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES · 2026Article
- Correlation of Routine Admission Inflammatory Biomarkers with Individual Traumatic Brain Lesion Types in Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.Biomedicines · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Isolated blunt head trauma (IBHT) is a common condition that can result in high mortality, requiring effective prognostic evaluations. Methods such as glucose-to-potassium ratio (GPR) and revised trauma score (RTS) have been developed to determine the mortality risk and optimize the treatment strategies. High GPR levels and low RTS levels are associated with increased mortality. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of GPR and RTS in predicting the prognosis in IBHT patients. A retrospective evaluation was conducted on demographic data, vital signs, laboratory values, and CT images of IBHT patients presenting to the emergency department (ED). GPR and RTS were calculated, and ED and in-hospital outcomes were assessed. 764 patients were included, with 70.9% male and a median age of 33. Median glucose and potassium levels were measured as 104 mg/dL and 4.2 mmol/L, respectively. CT imaging showed trauma-related pathology in 11.8% of patients, with isolated subarachnoid hemorrhage most common (30%). Ninety-one patients were hospitalized, 24 of whom underwent surgery (epidural hematoma was the most common pathology). 10 of the 91 hospitalized patients died. Both low RTS and high GPR were significantly associated with hospitalization (p < 0.001). RTS was significantly lower in patients with mortality (p < 0.001). No significant difference was found between patients' GPR with mortality or not (p = 0.261). RTS > 11 provided high sensitivity for survival (99.2%). GPR was not significantly associated with mortality in this cohort in IBHT patients, but RTS is effective in predicting mortality in these patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.