ArticleScientific reports2025
Green construction with sustainable foam mortar utilizing recycled polyethylene terephthalate waste for enhanced thermal insulation and durability properties.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study explores the development of a sustainable foam mortar incorporating recycled polyethylene terephthalate (PET) waste as a partial sand replacement to enhance thermal insulation and promote circular economy practices. Foamed mortars incorporating recycled polyethylene terephthalate (PET) waste were developed in this study, with the overall goal of addressing the dual challenge of waste management and resource depletion. PET waste, commonly discarded as environmental pollutants, was processed into fine aggregate sizes and used as a partial replacement for sand. There were six mix proportions with PET replacement ratios (0, 5, 10, 15, 20, and 25%). PET improved thermal insulation by lowering thermal conductivity from 0.31 W/mK to 0.26 W/mK and reducing density by up to 15%. At 28 days, the compressive strength varied between 12.5 MPa (0% PET) and 9.8 MPa (25% PET), suggesting that it is viable for non-structural applications. Similar declines of 25-30% and 20-25%, respectively, in flexural and tensile strengths were ascribed to weakened interfacial bonding between PET and the cement matrix. At higher PET levels, durability increased, with a 20% decrease in water absorption and a substantial decrease in chloride ion penetration. The use of PET significantly improved thermal properties, and microstructural analysis confirmed more refined pore structures and homogeneous dispersion of PET particles. These results show that PET can be a sustainable alternative to foam mortar, promoting environmentally friendly construction methods and the concepts of the circular economy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.