Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41022643›Full record

ArticleBMJ paediatrics open2025

Predicting risk of early-onset sepsis in low-resource neonatal units using routine healthcare data: development and evaluation of multivariable statistical and machine learning models.

Ed Lowther, Nushrat Khan, Mario Cortina-Borja, Gwendoline Lilly Chimhini, Samuel R Neal, Marcia Mangiza, Felicity Fitzgerald, Michelle Heys, Simbarashe Chimhuya

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ paediatrics open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ed Lowther *UCL Advanced Research Computing Centre, University College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-0556-5245
Nushrat Khan *Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4521-0920
Mario Cortina-BorjaPopulation, Policy and Practice Research and Teaching Department, University College London Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK.
Gwendoline Lilly ChimhiniNeonatal Unit, Sally Mugabe Central Hospital, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Samuel R NealInfectious Diseases, Imperial College London - South Kensington Campus, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6832-9839
Marcia MangizaNeonatal Unit, Sally Mugabe Central Hospital, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Felicity FitzgeraldInfectious Diseases, Imperial College London - South Kensington Campus, London, UK f.fitzgerald@imperial.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9594-3228
Michelle Heys *Population, Policy and Practice Research and Teaching Department, University College London Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1458-505X
Simbarashe Chimhuya *Population, Policy and Practice Research and Teaching Department, University College London Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK.

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNeonatal sepsis is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in low-resource settings and accurate, context-appropriate diagnostic methods are urgently needed to improve clinical outcomes.

methodsWe used data collected using Neotree, an open source digital health intervention tool, from neonates admitted to Sally Mugabe Central Hospital in Harare between February 2021 and September 2024 to model a composite outcome variable comprised of senior clinician-assigned diagnosis at discharge or cause of death and blood culture test results. Three statistical and machine learning algorithms were developed, tuned where appropriate using cross-validation and evaluated.

resultsIn total, 917 cases of early-onset neonatal sepsis were identified among the 18 345 neonates in our study sample, comprising 664 cases of clinician diagnosis and 253 positive blood culture results. With area under the receiver operating characteristic curve as a metric, LightGBM, a machine learning gradient-boosted tree classifier, performed marginally better (0.712; 95% CI 0.673 to 0.75) than logistic regression (0.687; 95% CI 0.646 to 0.728) on a held-out evaluation dataset. A simple and easily interpretable machine learning model, the

conclusionsThis study explored the potential advantages of using machine learning in the triage of neonates at risk of sepsis in low-resource settings where gold-standard blood culture test results are often unavailable. While the differences in performance metrics were not statistically significant, the machine learning approaches in our study offer other advantages including more intuitive predictions and the ability to handle missing data without imputation.

Indexed as

Intensive Care Units, NeonatalMachine LearningNeonatal SepsisFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornMaleModels, StatisticalRisk AssessmentTanzaniaMicrobiologyNeonatology

Identifiers

PMID41022643
PMCPMC12481410

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.