ReviewThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2026
GP workforce sustainability to maximise effective and equitable patient care: a realist review.
Review in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- De-humanising general practice leadership: shining a light on contemporary challenges.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2026Article
- Continuity of care in UK primary care: a scoping review of measures, challenges, and future interventions.Primary health care research & development · 2026Article
- Understanding and improving compound pressures in general practice: a realist review protocol.BJGP open · 2026Article
- Understanding the contextual and causal factors shaping the work of receptionists in general practice: a realist review protocol.BMJ open · 2025Article
- Type 2 statin use increased perioperative blood loss in primary reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundUK and global primary care face significant GP workforce shortages. Much research focuses on individual-level factors such as wellbeing, resilience, and professional identity; however, less attention has been given to organisational- and system-level influences on GP work and workforce sustainability.
aimTo examine how general practice work and healthcare systems support GP workforce sustainability and effective, equitable patient care. DESIGN AND
settingThis was a UK-focused realist review of empirical and grey literature. The search strategy encompassed six electronic databases.
methodThe realist synthesis involved 1) finding existing theories, 2) searching for evidence, 3) selecting articles, 4) extracting data, and 5) synthesising evidence and drawing conclusions. Context-mechanism-outcome configurations were developed using extracted data, alongside input from patient and public contributors and stakeholders to iteratively refine the programme theory.
resultsIn total, 190 documents were included. Findings highlight the importance of meaningful work and engagement; relationships across individuals, organisations, and communities; and learning and development. Sustaining the GP workforce and delivering effective and equitable patient care require congruence between GPs' core values and their work; cumulative-knowledge building; system agility; psychological safety; and direct human connections.
conclusionStructures, policies, and relational connections within general practice are central for sustaining the GP workforce and enabling effective, equitable patient care. Collaboration among GPs, patients, and policymakers is essential. Future systems should prioritise personalised care, support meaning making, and protect GP autonomy to foster sustained engagement, expertise, and equity in care delivery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.