ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2025
Use of new CORE risk score to predict 10 year risk of liver cirrhosis in general population: population based cohort study.
Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Changes in Muscle Mass and the Risk of Liver-Related Events: A Prospective Cohort Study.Diabetes, obesity & metabolism · 2026Article
- How to apply artificial intelligence (AI) to facilitate and enhance MASH trials.Hepatology international · 2026Review
- Hepatology: Emerging Paradigms in MASLD, Viral Hepatitis, Cholestatic Liver Disease, Portal Hypertension and Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Summary of the First Annual Paris International Liver Meeting 2026.Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · 2026Review
- Article
- The dynamic spectrum of steatotic liver disease: the global perspective.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2026Review
- Subtype Differences in Major Adverse Liver Outcomes and Cardiovascular Events and Mortality in Steatotic Liver Disease: A UK Biobank Analysis.Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics · 2026Article
- Alcohol-driven phenotypic transition in MASLD and risk of liver-related events.JHEP reports : innovation in hepatology · 2026Article
- Comparison of the diagnostic performance of alanine aminotransferase and ultrasonography for discrimination of liver biopsy proven metabolic associated steatotic liver disease: a ROC curve analysis.BMC endocrine disorders · 2026Article
- GLP-1 Receptor Agonists in Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease: Bridging Hepatic and Cardiovascular Outcomes.Chronic diseases and translational medicine · 2026Review
- Diagnostic innovation and models of care to improve fibrosis detection and risk stratification in steatotic liver disease.The Lancet regional health. Europe · 2026Review
- Identifying subjects at risk of liver cirrhosis via a range of thresholds for common fibrosis markers: A Welsh general population-based cohort study.Journal of internal medicine · 2026Article
- Development and internal validation of a risk model for hyperuricemia among people living with HIV in Hangzhou, China: a retrospective longitudinal cohort study.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- Old blood, new results: Will CORE fulfil the need for liver prognostication.JHEP reports : innovation in hepatology · 2026Article
- A Machine Learning-Based Model for Cirrhosis Risk Stratification Incorporating Noninvasive Markers and Clinical Variables.International journal of general medicine · 2026Article
- Impact of Donor Cirrhosis Outcome Risk Estimator (CORE) Score on Recipient Outcomes Following Living-donor Liver Transplantation.In vivo (Athens, Greece)Article
- Impact of Cirrhosis Outcome Risk Estimator Score on Outcomes Following Pancreatectomy for Resectable Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.In vivo (Athens, Greece)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo develop and validate a novel risk prediction model for incident major adverse liver outcomes (MALO) in a primary care setting.
designPopulation based cohort study.
settingSweden, with validation in Finland and the UK.
participantsModel development in 480 651 individuals with no known history of liver disease and blood tests taken in primary care or at occupational healthcare screenings; validation in two cohorts with 24 191 and 449 806 individuals without known history of liver disease.
main outcome measures10 year risk of a composite outcome of compensated and decompensated cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma, liver transplant, and liver related mortality, collectively referred to as MALO.
resultsA new risk model was created using flexible parametric survival models and several easily available laboratory based biomarkers. The model includes age, sex, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, and γ-glutamyl transferase. The model's performance was assessed in terms of discrimination (time dependent area under the curve), calibration (calibration curves), and clinical utility (decision curve analysis). External validation was done using data from the UK Biobank and the FINRISK and Health 2000 cohorts and compared with the FIB-4 score. The median follow-up time was 28 years, and 7168 MALO events were observed in that time. The incident risk of MALO at 10 years was 0.27%. The new risk score, termed CORE (Cirrhosis Outcome Risk Estimator), achieved a 10 year area under the curve of 88% (95% confidence interval 87% to 89%) compared with 79% (78% to 80%) for FIB-4. The calibration of CORE was good in all three cohorts, and according to the decision curve analysis CORE provides a higher net benefit than FIB-4 for all risk thresholds.
conclusionsThe CORE model, based on a flexible modelling approach and using biomarkers easily accessible in primary care, outperforms FIB-4 when predicting liver related outcomes in the general population and could be a novel means to stratify patients at risk for liver disease in the general population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.