Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41022462›Full record

ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2025

Use of new CORE risk score to predict 10 year risk of liver cirrhosis in general population: population based cohort study.

Rickard Strandberg, Fredrik Åberg, Juho V Asteljoki, Panu K Luukkonen, Veikko Salomaa, Antti Jula, Annamari Lundqvist, Satu Männistö, Markus Perola, Mats Talbäck and 2 more

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. The dynamic spectrum of steatotic liver disease: the global perspective.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Rickard StrandbergDepartment of Medicine, Huddinge, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden rickard.strandberg@ki.se.ORCID 0000-0001-8960-3497
Fredrik ÅbergTransplantation and Liver Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Juho V AsteljokiMinerva Foundation Institute for Medical Research, Helsinki, Finland.
Panu K LuukkonenMinerva Foundation Institute for Medical Research, Helsinki, Finland.
Veikko SalomaaFinnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland.
Antti JulaFinnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland.
Annamari LundqvistFinnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland.
Satu MännistöFinnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland.
Markus PerolaFinnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland.
Mats TalbäckInstitute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Niklas HammarInstitute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Hannes HagströmDepartment of Medicine, Huddinge, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo develop and validate a novel risk prediction model for incident major adverse liver outcomes (MALO) in a primary care setting.

designPopulation based cohort study.

settingSweden, with validation in Finland and the UK.

participantsModel development in 480 651 individuals with no known history of liver disease and blood tests taken in primary care or at occupational healthcare screenings; validation in two cohorts with 24 191 and 449 806 individuals without known history of liver disease.

main outcome measures10 year risk of a composite outcome of compensated and decompensated cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma, liver transplant, and liver related mortality, collectively referred to as MALO.

resultsA new risk model was created using flexible parametric survival models and several easily available laboratory based biomarkers. The model includes age, sex, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, and γ-glutamyl transferase. The model's performance was assessed in terms of discrimination (time dependent area under the curve), calibration (calibration curves), and clinical utility (decision curve analysis). External validation was done using data from the UK Biobank and the FINRISK and Health 2000 cohorts and compared with the FIB-4 score. The median follow-up time was 28 years, and 7168 MALO events were observed in that time. The incident risk of MALO at 10 years was 0.27%. The new risk score, termed CORE (Cirrhosis Outcome Risk Estimator), achieved a 10 year area under the curve of 88% (95% confidence interval 87% to 89%) compared with 79% (78% to 80%) for FIB-4. The calibration of CORE was good in all three cohorts, and according to the decision curve analysis CORE provides a higher net benefit than FIB-4 for all risk thresholds.

conclusionsThe CORE model, based on a flexible modelling approach and using biomarkers easily accessible in primary care, outperforms FIB-4 when predicting liver related outcomes in the general population and could be a novel means to stratify patients at risk for liver disease in the general population.

Indexed as

Liver CirrhosisAdultAgedAlanine TransaminaseAspartate AminotransferasesBiomarkersCohort StudiesFemaleFinlandgamma-GlutamyltransferaseHumansLiver NeoplasmsLiver TransplantationMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsAlanine TransaminaseAspartate AminotransferasesBiomarkersgamma-Glutamyltransferase

Identifiers

PMID41022462
PMCPMC12492969

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.