ArticleJournal of Korean Neurosurgical Society2025
Prediction of Angle Loss after L4/5 Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion : Development of a Risk Stratification Model.
Article in Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the influence of preoperative disc morphology and cage-related variables on disc angle change following single-level L4/5 oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF), and to identify predictors of postoperative angle loss and angular subsidence.
methodsThis retrospective study analyzed 80 patients who underwent L4/5 OLIF with posterior percutaneous screw fixation and 1-year radiographic follow-up. Radiographic parameters included preoperative disc angle (DAPRE), sacral slope (SS), and cage position along the anteroposterior axis (Cage_Y). Postoperative disc angle loss was defined as a decrease in disc angle immediately after surgery. Angular subsidence was defined as a decrease in disc angle at follow-up compared to the postoperative period multivariate logistic regression was used to identify independent predictors of these outcomes. Threshold values were determined by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.
resultsDAPRE >6.0°, SS <32.0°, and posterior cage placement (Cage_Y <1.9 mm) were independently associated with immediate angle loss. Among them, DAPRE showed the strongest predictive power (odds ratio, 7.9). Additionally, a greater initial angular gain was associated with a higher risk of angular subsidence. Based on these three parameters, a risk score (0-3 points) was generated, which showed a stepwise increase in the incidence of angle loss (0% to 81.3%) and subsidence over follow-up.
conclusionDAPRE, SS, and Cage_Y are key predictors of disc angle outcomes after OLIF. This model provides a simple, clinically applicable tool to predict alignment maintenance and optimize surgical planning in degenerative lumbar conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.