Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41022401›Full record

ArticleJournal of breast cancer2025

Factors Predicting Additional Residual Nodal Disease With a Metastatic Sentinel Node Biopsy or Targeted Axillary Dissection After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.

Neslihan Cabıoğlu, Hasan Karanlık, Abdullah Iğci, Mahmut Müslümanoğlu, Okan Mustafa Gürsoy, Mustafa Tükenmez, Nusret Can Polat, Enver Özkurt, Selman Emiroğlu, Nilüfer Yıldırım and 12 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of breast cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Neslihan CabıoğluDepartment of Surgery, Istanbul University, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Türkiye. neslicab@yahoo.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0989-7411
Hasan KaranlıkDivision of Surgical Oncology, Istanbul University, Institute of Oncology, Istanbul, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6156-7260
Abdullah IğciDepartment of Surgery, Istanbul University, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4986-9167
Mahmut MüslümanoğluDepartment of Surgery, Istanbul University, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0279-5671
Okan Mustafa GürsoyDepartment of Surgery, Istanbul University, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-7052-798X
Mustafa TükenmezDepartment of Surgery, Istanbul University, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3879-1982
Nusret Can PolatDepartment of Surgery, Istanbul University, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2525-8476
Enver ÖzkurtDepartment of General Surgery, Demiroğlu Bilim University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2597-3119
Selman EmiroğluDepartment of Surgery, Istanbul University, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9333-6926
Nilüfer YıldırımDepartment of Surgery, American Hospital, Istanbul, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9201-8552
Ahmet Serkan IlgünDepartment of General Surgery, Demiroğlu Bilim University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4862-2891
Semen ÖnderDepartment of Pathology, Istanbul University, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1384-630X
Ravza YılmazDepartment of Radiology, Istanbul University, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8661-6751
Memduh DursunDepartment of Radiology, Istanbul University, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8563-3728
Duygu Has SimşekDepartment of Nuclear Scintigraphy, Istanbul University, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6975-2230
Pınar SaipDepartment of Medical Oncology, Istanbul University, Institute of Oncology, Istanbul, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6871-8519
Adnan AydınerDepartment of Medical Oncology, Istanbul University, Institute of Oncology, Istanbul, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1104-5840
Aysel BayramDepartment of Pathology, Istanbul University, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-6566-3646
Baran MollavelioğluDepartment of Surgery, Istanbul University, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3152-044X
Kamuran IbişDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Istanbul University, Institute of Oncology, Istanbul, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7928-6264
Seden KüçücükDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Istanbul University, Institute of Oncology, Istanbul, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6984-3466
Vahit ÖzmenDepartment of Surgery, Istanbul University, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2973-8247

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study aimed to investigate whether specific clinicopathological characteristics are associated with a lower likelihood of additional positive nodes (APNs) on completion axillary lymph node dissection (cALND).

methodsA total of 497 patients with cT1-4/N1-3 disease underwent cALND following a positive sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) or targeted axillary dissection (TAD) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). The APN rate was assessed based on findings from the cALND.

resultsThe median age was 47 (21-84). The overall APN rate was 67.6%. Patients with cT1-2 disease, a breast pathological complete response, removal of > two nodes via SLNB or TAD, only one metastatic node identified at SLNB or TAD, a lymph node ratio (LNR) < 50%, or low-volume metastatic disease (including isolated tumor cells [ITCs] or micro-metastases) at SLNB or TAD were significantly less likely to have APN on cALND (

conclusionIn patients with a positive SLNB or TAD after NAC, an APN rate < 30% on cALND can be achieved in certain subgroups with favorable features, including cT1-2 and cN1 disease and low-volume metastatic burden.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsNeoadjuvant TherapySentinel Lymph Node

Identifiers

PMID41022401
PMCPMC12599433

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.