Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41022373›Full record

ArticleJMIR cancer2025

The Provision of Social Support in an Online Support Forum for Caregivers of People With Comorbid Dementia and Cancer: Content Analysis Study.

Mollie Louise Price, Claire Surr, Brendan Gough, David Howe, Laura Ashley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mollie Louise PriceSchool of Humanities & Social Sciences, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-7884-3644
Claire SurrCentre for Dementia Research, School of Health, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-4312-6661
Brendan GoughSchool of Humanities & Social Sciences, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-7438-0139
David HoweSchool of Humanities & Social Sciences, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-8618-5776
Laura AshleySchool of Humanities & Social Sciences, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-9439-3778

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA growing number of people are living with comorbid dementia and cancer (CDC), and they are particularly likely to require support from family caregivers. Carers of people with CDC play a vital supportive role but have reported unmet support needs, including a lack of CDC-specific information resources and peer support. A targeted online peer support forum may provide an accessible way to help address unmet needs of carers of people with CDC.

objectiveThis study aimed to explore the types and frequency of social support provided on an online peer support forum for caregivers of people with CDC, hosted by a dementia charity in the United Kingdom.

methodsWe conducted a mixed methods study using descriptive statistics and qualitative content analysis. All posts (N=893) on the forum since its launch in November 2018 to April 2024 were exported into Microsoft Excel for analysis. Descriptive statistics were used to examine forum use and user characteristics. Deductive content analysis was conducted to explore the types and frequency of social support provided on the forum. Posts were analyzed according to an adapted version of Cutrona and Suhr's Social Support Behavior Code, consisting of 5 main categories of support: informational, emotional, esteem, network, and tangible. Coding was completed independently by 2 coders, and any coding disagreements were resolved by reaching a consensus through discussion.

resultsA total of 258 usernames posted on the forum since its inception. There were 893 posts; 583 (65.3%) were coded as providing social support. All 5 Social Support Behavior Code categories were present in the forum posts. Informational support was the most common type of social support provided on the forum, which mostly involved providing suggestions for caregiving and coping strategies and sharing personal experiences that provide CDC-specific knowledge or insight. This was followed by emotional support, which consisted mostly of expressing shared understanding and empathy for caregivers in their unique situation of CDC and providing expressions of care for the recipient's well-being. Esteem, network, and tangible support were less common, though they included providing validation and relief of blame to other caregivers, typically in decision-making regarding cancer treatment; reminding caregivers that others were available on the forum for support; and expressing willingness to answer questions about their CDC caregiving experience.

conclusionsThis study demonstrates the use and value of a CDC-specific online forum as a source of social support for carers of people with CDC, facilitating users' access to CDC-specific information and peer support. The relatively new forum shows promise as a free and accessible resource that can contribute to addressing carers' informational and peer support needs.

Indexed as

CaregiversDementiaNeoplasmsSocial SupportComorbidityFemaleHumansInternetMaleQualitative ResearchUnited Kingdomcancercaregivingcarerscontent analysisdementiainternet-based interventionmultimorbidityonline health communitiespeer supportsocial supportsupport groups

Identifiers

PMID41022373
PMCPMC12519022

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.