Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41022295›Full record

ArticleBrain, behavior, and immunity2025

Cachexia in mice blunts improved cognitive flexibility induced by calorie restriction.

Kyna Conn, Laura K Milton, Alyssa Teoh, Priscila T Levi, Kelly L Walton, Zane B Andrews, Claire J Foldi, Sarah H Lockie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain, behavior, and immunity, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. The causes of cachexia: key signals and the brain.Nature reviews. Endocrinology · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kyna ConnMonash Biomedicine Discovery Institute and Department of Physiology, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria 3800, Australia.
Laura K MiltonMonash Biomedicine Discovery Institute and Department of Physiology, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria 3800, Australia.
Alyssa TeohMonash Biomedicine Discovery Institute and Department of Physiology, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria 3800, Australia.
Priscila T LeviMonash Biomedicine Discovery Institute and Department of Physiology, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria 3800, Australia.
Kelly L WaltonSchool of Biomedical Sciences, University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Qld, Australia.
Zane B AndrewsMonash Biomedicine Discovery Institute and Department of Physiology, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria 3800, Australia.
Claire J FoldiMonash Biomedicine Discovery Institute and Department of Physiology, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria 3800, Australia.
Sarah H LockieMonash Biomedicine Discovery Institute and Department of Physiology, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria 3800, Australia. Electronic address: sarah.lockie@monash.edu.

Funding

PQ6: Therapeutic approaches for autonomic and neuroendocrine dysfunction in cancer cachexiaR01CA264133 · NCI · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI GROSSBERG, AARON · 2021 to 2025
$2.1M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA264133
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Approximately 50-80 % of cancer patients suffer from cachexia, a metabolic syndrome involving inflammation, appetite loss, and muscle and fat wasting. Another common co-morbidity of cancer patients is cognitive impairment, and clinical evidence suggests the incidence of cachexia is linked to more severe cognitive symptoms. Given the difficulty of studying changes in cognitive function in human cancer patients, we set out to examine key aspects of cognitive performance in a mouse model of pancreatic cancer (pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma; PDAC) cachexia, using an in-cage operant device (Feeding Experimental Device version 3; FED3) and a reversal learning task. Performance on the operant reversal task was compared to two control groups without cancer: ad libitum fed, sham injected with phosphate buffered saline (PBS), calorie restricted (CR) to 90-95 % of original body weight to control for reduced food intake and weight loss in cachexia mice. Our PDAC model recapitulated features of cachexia, including anorexia, weight loss, muscle wastage and inflammation. CR mice performed significantly better on the reversal task than both PDAC and PBS mice, achieving significantly more reversals and greater pellet retrieval. There was no difference between PBS and PDAC groups. These results suggest that the weight and appetite loss that occurs during cancer is processed by the brain differently to weight loss that occurs as a result of calorie restriction, with PDAC mice not experiencing an increase in motivational drive for food in line with their falling body weight. To mimic the malaise experienced by the PDAC group, we dosed CR mice with LiCl. Low dose (150 mM) LiCl did not affect responding, however, high dose (300 mM) LiCl significantly reduced both number of active pokes and pellet retrieval. This indicates a sickness-induced devaluation of reward, a factor that may impact poor performance of this task in the PDAC group. We additionally examined exploratory and anxiety-like behaviour in PBS and PDAC groups using a battery of maze-based tests. We saw no significant differences in performance between groups in the elevated plus maze, open field or light/dark box, suggesting no elevations in baseline anxiety-like symptoms in this cachexia model. These results occurred in the face of significantly elevated levels of the pro-cachexia factors GDF15, Activin A and Activin B, indicating that elevated levels of these TGF-β family peptides are not sufficient to produce behavioural changes in these tests. Our results provide evidence for a specific impact of sickness state on cognitive flexibility during pancreatic cancer.

Indexed as

CachexiaCaloric RestrictionCognitionAnimalsCarcinoma, Pancreatic DuctalCognitive FlexibilityConditioning, OperantDisease Models, AnimalMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLPancreatic NeoplasmsReversal LearningBehaviourCancer cachexiaCognitive flexibilityInstrumental learningLiClMalaiseMouse modelReversal learning

Identifiers

PMID41022295
PMCPMC13268675

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.