Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41022288›Full record

ArticleBrain research bulletin2025

Geometry Reduced Order Modeling (GROM) with application to modeling of glymphatic function.

Andreas Solheim, Geir Ringstad, Per Kristian Eide, Kent-Andre Mardal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain research bulletin, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Andreas SolheimDepartment of Numerical Analysis and Scientific Computing (SCAN), Simula Research Laboratories, Kristian Augusts gate 23, Oslo, 0164, Norway; Department of Mathematics, University of Oslo, Moltke Moes vei 35, Oslo, 0851, Norway. Electronic address: solheim@simula.no.
Geir RingstadK.G. Jebsen Centre for Brain Fluid Research, University of Oslo, Pb 1072 Blindern, Oslo, 0316, Norway; Department of Radiology, Oslo University Hospital, Pb 4950 Nydalen, Oslo, 0424, Norway; Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Klaus Torgårds vei 3, Oslo, 0372, Norway; Department of Geriatric Medicine, Sørlandet Hospital Trust, Pb 416 Lundsiden, Arendal, 4604, Norway.
Per Kristian EideK.G. Jebsen Centre for Brain Fluid Research, University of Oslo, Pb 1072 Blindern, Oslo, 0316, Norway; Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Klaus Torgårds vei 3, Oslo, 0372, Norway; Department of Neurosurgery, Oslo University Hospital-Rikshospitalet, Sognsvannsveien 20, Oslo, 0372, Norway.
Kent-Andre MardalDepartment of Numerical Analysis and Scientific Computing (SCAN), Simula Research Laboratories, Kristian Augusts gate 23, Oslo, 0164, Norway; Department of Mathematics, University of Oslo, Moltke Moes vei 35, Oslo, 0851, Norway; K.G. Jebsen Centre for Brain Fluid Research, University of Oslo, Pb 1072 Blindern, Oslo, 0316, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Computational modeling of the brain has become a key part of understanding how the brain clears metabolic waste, but patient-specific modeling on a significant scale is still out of reach with current methods. We introduce a novel approach for leveraging model order reduction techniques in computational models of brain geometries to alleviate computational costs involved in numerical simulations. Using image registration methods based on magnetic resonance imaging, we compute inter-brain mappings which allow previously computed solutions on other geometries to be mapped on to a new geometry. We investigate this approach on two example problems typical of modeling of glymphatic function, applied to a dataset of 101 MRI of human patients. We discuss the applicability of the method when applied to a patient with no known neurological disease, as well as a patient diagnosed with idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus displaying significantly enlarged ventricles. In each of our two example problems, we achieve a speedup of more 750 times compared to the full order problem, while introducing a comparably small additional system assembly overhead. The reduced solutions recover the full order solution with an error of less than 10% in most cases. Statement of significance: In many fields, model order reduction is a key technique in enabling high-throughput numerical simulations, but remains largely unexploited for biomedical modeling of the brain. In this work, we introduce a novel technique for building reduced representations integrating simulations performed on other brain geometries derived from MRI. Using this technique, we may leverage a dataset of previous solutions to accelerate simulations on new geometries, making patient-specific modeling more feasible.

Indexed as

BrainGlymphatic SystemModels, NeurologicalComputer SimulationHumansHydrocephalus, Normal PressureMagnetic Resonance ImagingGlymphatic systemIdiopathic Normal Pressure HydrocephalusImage registrationModel order reductionNumerical simulation

Identifiers

PMID41022288
PMCPMC12510912

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.