Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41022132›Full record

ReviewThrombosis and haemostasis2026

Usefulness and Limits of DOAC Removal Agents Based on Activated Charcoal in Thrombophilia Testing: Literature Review and Expert Proposals.

Georges Jourdi, Claire Flaujac, Emmanuel De Maistre, Nicolas Gendron, Valérie Eschwège, Laetitia Mauge, French Society on Thrombosis Haemostasis

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Thrombosis and haemostasis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Georges JourdiService d'Hématologie Biologique, Hôpital Lariboisière, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris Nord (APHP.Nord), Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0001-8738-5975
Claire FlaujacLaboratoire de Biologie Médicale (Secteur Hémostase), Centre Hospitalier de Versailles - Hôpital André Mignot, Le Chesnay-Rocquencourt, France.ORCID 0000-0002-3662-3416
Emmanuel De MaistreLaboratoire d'Hémostase, CHU Dijon Bourgogne, Dijon, France.ORCID 0000-0003-3459-7397
Nicolas GendronService d'Hématologie Biologique, Centre-Université de Paris (APHP.CUP), Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0003-4852-4738
Valérie EschwègeService d'Hématologie Biologique, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nancy, France.ORCID 0000-0001-9057-9295
Laetitia MaugeService d'Hématologie Biologique, Centre-Université de Paris (APHP.CUP), Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-3946-2312
French Society on Thrombosis Haemostasis

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although inherited and acquired thrombophilia screening should ideally be performed outside of any direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) therapy, it is sometimes performed in patients who are anticoagulated. However, DOACs have been shown to interfere with many hemostasis tests, with a risk of false-positive/negative results in lupus anticoagulant testing and overestimation of natural coagulation inhibitor levels, which may lead to misdiagnosis. Devices have been developed to overcome DOAC interference but their role in thrombophilia testing is not clearly established. In this comprehensive review, we provide an in-depth overview of the literature on the impact of DOACs on thrombophilia assays, including lupus anticoagulant testing, antithrombin, protein C, and protein S assessment. DOACs can interfere with the results of thrombophilia testing even at low concentrations; therefore information on current or recently discontinued anticoagulant treatment should be provided when prescribing thrombophilia testing. Data on the usefulness of the most used DOAC removal systems based on activated charcoal to circumvent DOAC interference are heterogeneous. They are summarized in this critical review. Although activated charcoal could be useful to remove DOACs from plasma prior to thrombophilia testing, it may not be completely effective, particularly with apixaban. Hence, and in the light of the available literature, we provide 22 practical proposals for reliable thrombophilia testing and accurate result interpretation in samples from patients receiving DOACs and treated in vitro with activated charcoal.

Indexed as

AnticoagulantsCharcoalThrombophiliaAdministration, OralBlood CoagulationBlood Coagulation TestsHumansLupus Coagulation InhibitorPredictive Value of TestsPyridonesAnticoagulantsCharcoalLupus Coagulation InhibitorPyridones

Identifiers

PMID41022132
PMCPMC13521663

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.