Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41022066›Full record

Observational studyThe Journal of international medical research2025

Prechemoradiotherapy number of natural teeth as a prognostic factor in patients with locally advanced nasopharyngeal cancer: A retrospective observational study.

Erkan Topkan, Efsun Somay, Sibel Bascil, Duriye Ozturk, Ugur Selek

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in The Journal of international medical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Erkan TopkanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Başkent University, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0001-8120-7123
Efsun SomayDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Başkent University, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0001-8251-6913
Sibel BascilDepartment of Periodontology, Faculty of Dentistry, Başkent University, Turkey.
Duriye OzturkDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Afyonkarahisar Health Sciences University, Turkey.
Ugur SelekDepartment of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Koc University, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

ObjectiveThis study evaluated the prognostic value of the pretreatment number of natural teeth on progression-free survival and overall survival in patients with locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed 248 patients with locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy-based concurrent chemoradiotherapy and adjuvant chemotherapy between June 2010 and December 2021. The number of natural teeth was assessed before concurrent chemoradiotherapy. A receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed to identify the optimal number of natural teeth threshold predictive of overall survival and progression-free survival.ResultsThe optimal cutoff value for the number of natural teeth was 19.5 (area under the curve: 70.6%). Patients were grouped into those with a number of natural teeth <20 (

Indexed as

ChemoradiotherapyNasopharyngeal CarcinomaNasopharyngeal NeoplasmsToothAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisProgression-Free SurvivalRadiotherapy, Intensity-ModulatedRetrospective StudiesROC Curveconcurrent chemoradiotherapyNasopharyngeal cancernumber of natural teethoral healthsurvival outcomes

Identifiers

PMID41022066
PMCPMC12480824

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.