ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2025
A district-level ensemble model to enhance dengue prediction and control for the Mekong Delta Region of Vietnam.
Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Barriers in operating proactive source reduction informed by an early warning system for dengue prevention: A qualitative study from end-user perspectives in Vietnam.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2026Article
- Forecasting and Early Warning Systems for Dengue Outbreaks: Updated Narrative Review.Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The Mekong Delta Region (MDR) of Vietnam faces increasing vulnerability to severe dengue outbreaks due to urbanization, globalization, and climate change, necessitating effective early warning systems for outbreak mitigation. This study developed a probabilistic forecasting model to predict dengue incidence and outbreaks with 1-3-month lead times, incorporating meteorological, sociodemographic, preventive, and epidemiological data. A total of 72 models were evaluated, with top performers from spatiotemporal models, supervised PCA, and semi-mechanistic hhh4 frameworks combined into an ensemble. Using data from 2004-2011 for development, 2012-2016 for cross-validation, and 2017-2022 for evaluation, the ensemble model integrated five individual models to forecast dengue incidence up to three months ahead. Performance was assessed using Brier Score, Continuous Ranked Probability Score, bias, and diffuseness, and we evaluated performance by horizon, geography, and seasonality. Using the 95th percentile of the historical distribution as the epidemic threshold, the ensemble model achieved 69% accuracy at a 3-month horizon during evaluation, surpassing the reference model's 58%, though it struggled in years with atypical seasonality, such as 2019 and 2022, possibly due to COVID-19 disruptions. By providing critical lead time, the model enables health systems to allocate resources, plan interventions, and engage communities in dengue prevention and control.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.