Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41022026›Full record

ArticlePoultry science2025

Comparative transcriptomic and meat quality responses to electrical and controlled atmosphere stunning in broiler chickens.

Chang-Hyeon Ham, Jung Hwan Jeon, Seung-Hoon Lee, Seok-Won Lim, Chiwoong Lim, Min-Jae Jang, Byeonghwi Lim, Min-Ki Seok, Se Jin Lim, Chan Ho Kim and 1 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Poultry science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Chang-Hyeon HamDepartment of Animal Science and Technology, Chung-Ang University, Anseong, Gyeonggi-do 17546, Republic of Korea.
Jung Hwan JeonAnimal Welfare Division, National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration, Wanju 55365, Republic of Korea.
Seung-Hoon LeeDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, College of Applied Life Sciences, Jeju National University, Jeju 63243, Republic of Korea.
Seok-Won LimDepartment of Animal Science and Technology, Chung-Ang University, Anseong, Gyeonggi-do 17546, Republic of Korea.
Chiwoong LimDepartment of Animal Science and Technology, Chung-Ang University, Anseong, Gyeonggi-do 17546, Republic of Korea.
Min-Jae JangDepartment of Animal Science and Technology, Chung-Ang University, Anseong, Gyeonggi-do 17546, Republic of Korea.
Byeonghwi LimDepartment of Animal Science and Technology, Chung-Ang University, Anseong, Gyeonggi-do 17546, Republic of Korea.
Min-Ki SeokDepartment of Animal Science and Technology, Chung-Ang University, Anseong, Gyeonggi-do 17546, Republic of Korea.
Se Jin LimAnimal Welfare Division, National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration, Wanju 55365, Republic of Korea.
Chan Ho KimAnimal Welfare Division, National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration, Wanju 55365, Republic of Korea.
Jun-Mo KimDepartment of Animal Science and Technology, Chung-Ang University, Anseong, Gyeonggi-do 17546, Republic of Korea. Electronic address: junmokim@cau.ac.kr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the poultry industry, the slaughter process poses significant animal welfare concerns due to the substantial stress it induces in broilers. Electrical stunning (ES) and controlled atmosphere stunning (CAS) are commonly used methods to render broilers unconscious before slaughter, but both have welfare implications. This study compares ES and CAS by analyzing stress-related gene expression profiles using RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) and evaluating meat quality parameters. The results reveal distinct molecular responses to each method. Meat quality analysis shows that ES leads to higher redness and fat content, while CAS results in greater moisture content. ES induces physiological stress by causing tissue damage and activating inflammatory pathways, whereas CAS does so through hypercapnia and immune response downregulation, suggesting lower oxidative stress and reduced physiological burden. Future studies should integrate behavioral and neurophysiological assessments, tissue-specific histology, biochemical markers, and comparative evaluations of inert-gas stunning methods (e.g., argon, nitrogen) to better contextualize welfare implications. These findings provide new insights into the molecular and physiological impacts of stunning methods, contributing to the development of more humane poultry production practices.

Indexed as

Animal HusbandryAnimal WelfareChickensElectroshockMeatTranscriptomeAbattoirsAnimalsMaleStress, PhysiologicalBroilerMeat qualityStunningTranscriptomeWelfare

Identifiers

PMID41022026
PMCPMC12510198

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.