ArticlePoultry science2025
Comparative transcriptomic and meat quality responses to electrical and controlled atmosphere stunning in broiler chickens.
Article in Poultry science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the poultry industry, the slaughter process poses significant animal welfare concerns due to the substantial stress it induces in broilers. Electrical stunning (ES) and controlled atmosphere stunning (CAS) are commonly used methods to render broilers unconscious before slaughter, but both have welfare implications. This study compares ES and CAS by analyzing stress-related gene expression profiles using RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) and evaluating meat quality parameters. The results reveal distinct molecular responses to each method. Meat quality analysis shows that ES leads to higher redness and fat content, while CAS results in greater moisture content. ES induces physiological stress by causing tissue damage and activating inflammatory pathways, whereas CAS does so through hypercapnia and immune response downregulation, suggesting lower oxidative stress and reduced physiological burden. Future studies should integrate behavioral and neurophysiological assessments, tissue-specific histology, biochemical markers, and comparative evaluations of inert-gas stunning methods (e.g., argon, nitrogen) to better contextualize welfare implications. These findings provide new insights into the molecular and physiological impacts of stunning methods, contributing to the development of more humane poultry production practices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.