ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2025
Higher-order interactions in neuronal function: From genes to ionic currents in biophysical models.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Identity crisis: exploring the boundaries of cell type identification in the age of single-cell transcriptomics.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Neuronal firing patterns are the consequence of precise variations in neuronal membrane potential, which are themselves shaped by multiple ionic currents. In this study, we use biophysical models, statistical methods, and information theory to explore the interaction between these ionic currents and neuron electrophysiological phenotype. We created numerous electrical models with diverse firing patterns. By analyzing these models, we identified intricate relationships between model parameters and electrical features. Our findings show that neuronal activity is often influenced by multiple biophysical model parameters, in a nonadditive (i.e. synergistic) fashion. When comparing this with single-cell RNAseq data, we found a contrasting structure: gene expression profiles were dominated by redundancy, reflecting differences in regulatory constraints and sampling diversity. This research sheds light on the complex links between biophysical parameters and neuronal phenotypes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.