Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41021806›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2025

Hidden order in active nematic defects.

Alexis de la Cotte, Daniel J G Pearce, Jyothishraj Nambisan, Leonardo Puggioni, Aviv Levy, Luca Giomi, Alberto Fernandez-Nieves

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Alexis de la Cotte *Department of Condensed Matter Physics, University of Barcelona, Barcelona 08028, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-2202-4041
Daniel J G Pearce *Department of Theoretical Physics, Université de Genève, Genève 1205, Switzerland.
Jyothishraj Nambisan *Department of Condensed Matter Physics, University of Barcelona, Barcelona 08028, Spain.
Leonardo PuggioniInstituut-Lorentz, Universiteit Leiden, Leiden 2300 RA, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3544-6240
Aviv LevyInstituut-Lorentz, Universiteit Leiden, Leiden 2300 RA, The Netherlands.
Luca GiomiInstituut-Lorentz, Universiteit Leiden, Leiden 2300 RA, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7740-5960
Alberto Fernandez-NievesDepartment of Condensed Matter Physics, University of Barcelona, Barcelona 08028, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-1286-9809

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hyperuniformity and giant number fluctuations represent opposite ends in a spectrum of statistical correlations found in physical systems outside of thermal equilibrium. Dynamic phase transitions exhibit critical points that are hyperuniform, while anomalously large fluctuations are often quoted as a hallmark of active matter. Here, we show that the apparently disordered state of active nematic defects exhibits suppression of fluctuations on scales as large as the system size, reminiscent of what is seen for ordered lattices. Modeling the nematic defects in terms of continuum densities, we show that their distribution becomes asymptotically hyperuniform in the limit where their proliferation is solely driven by activity, rather than by thermal fluctuations. When both effects are at play, the resultant hyperuniform structure is limited to a finite range of length scales, [Formula: see text], with [Formula: see text] as thermal unbinding is suppressed. The system of active nematic defects can therefore be said to possess hidden order across scales provided

Indexed as

active matterhyperuniformitynematic defectsnumber fluctuations

Identifiers

PMID41021806
PMCPMC12519205

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.