ArticleInterventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences2025
Preliminary efficacy analysis of middle meningeal artery embolization using Glubran 2 for chronic subdural hematoma.
Article in Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
ObjectiveTo preliminarily conclude the safety and efficacy of middle meningeal artery embolization (MMAE) with Glubran 2 in treating chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH).MethodsThis retrospective analysis was performed on 40 consecutive CSDH patients who received MMAE with Glubran 2 between 2021 and 2023. The patients were followed up for 3 years post-operationally. Surgical procedures included burr hole drainage (BHD) and MMAE, both of which were performed under local anesthesia. MMAE with Glubran 2 was performed through transfemoral access. Postoperative recurrence was defined as an increase in hematoma volume based on computed tomography (CT) and/or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) accompanied by clinical symptoms, which require further treatment within 3 years postoperatively.ResultsIn this study, 40 CSDH patients (34 male and six female) with a mean age of 68.2 ± 13.2 years were included. Of these, 38 patients underwent MMAE-assisted BHD. Two patients received MMAE alone. A single-branch embolization was performed on 20 hematomas in 18 patients, and a double-branch on 27 hematomas in 22 patients. At the three-year follow-up, 33 patients were successfully contacted, and 24 patients showed significant improvement or were asymptomatic after treatment. Three patients passed away owing to non-CSDH-related reasons. One patient developed decompensated liver cirrhosis, one experienced Alzheimer's disease, and four patients experiencing deteriorated functions were unclear but non-CSDH related as demonstrated by absorbed hematomas on head CT or MRI during return visits. The median follow-up time was 35 (IQR 27-40) months, and the median mRS score was 0 (IQR 0-0).ConclusionMMAE-assisted BHD with Glubran 2 is feasible, safe, and effective in treating CSDH, with no associated complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.