ArticlePerception2026
Avatars versus the people: Photo-realism, spontaneous detection and trait inferences of digitised faces.
Article in Perception, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Technologies aiming to imitate human faces are becoming increasingly realistic. This study investigates a facial imitation technology that is becoming widespread - digital characters of people for presentation in virtual reality. Avatar faces were created from high-resolution 3D scans of real people. Across a series of four experiments, the photo-realism of these avatar faces was compared with passport-style face photographs of the same persons. In Experiments 1 and 2, these stimuli could be distinguished with high accuracy when a direct comparison of avatars and photographs was possible. In contrast, discrimination accuracy decreased when avatars and photographs were encountered in isolation, while awareness that avatar faces had been encountered was also low. Experiments 3 and 4 showed that avatars and face photographs generate similar trait inferences of attractiveness, dominance and trustworthiness. In cases where differences between avatars and photographs emerge, analysis of viewing patterns indicates that these originate from the eye region of these stimuli, which receive more fixations in avatars than face photographs. These findings demonstrate that the visual realism of avatars can closely resemble that of face photographs, particularly in contexts in which realism is not explicitly evaluated. Differences between avatars and photographs become more apparent when participants are cognizant and able to make direct comparisons.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.