Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41021626›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Robust unmanned aerial vehicles tracking amid electronic interference utilizing auxiliary particle filtering.

Le Qi, Tao Zhang, Guoming Chen, Wanyang Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Le QiAviation Maintenance NCO School, Air Force Engineering University, Xinyang, Henan, China.
Tao ZhangAviation Maintenance NCO School, Air Force Engineering University, Xinyang, Henan, China.ORCID 0009-0000-1007-7536
Guoming ChenAviation Maintenance NCO School, Air Force Engineering University, Xinyang, Henan, China.
Wanyang WangAviation Maintenance NCO School, Air Force Engineering University, Xinyang, Henan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electronic interference poses a significant challenge to Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) tracking systems, compromising navigation accuracy and operational safety in critical applications such as surveillance, disaster response, and infrastructure inspection. This study introduces a novel application of the Auxiliary Particle Filter (APF) for robust UAV tracking under interference conditions, focusing on fixed-reference scenarios. The APF incorporates adaptive proposal distributions and robust weight updates to effectively mitigate interference-induced measurement errors. Through comprehensive simulation that evaluates performance under varying interference and sensor degradation scenarios, the APF demonstrates superior accuracy, achieving a mean Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) of 4.82 meters with low variability ([Formula: see text]m). This significantly outperforms traditional filters, including the Extended Kalman Filter (EKF) and Unscented Kalman Filter (UKF). Notably, the APF maintains stable performance even under severe interference conditions, where conventional approaches exhibit substantial degradation. Statistical validation confirms these improvements across all test scenarios (p < 0.001). The detailed implementation guidelines provided in this study enable adoption across diverse operational contexts. These findings establish the APF as a robust and reliable solution for interference-prone environments and lay the groundwork for its adaptation to more dynamic tracking scenarios in autonomous UAV operations.

Indexed as

AircraftUnmanned Aerial DevicesAlgorithms

Identifiers

PMID41021626
PMCPMC12478901

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.