Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41021623›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Exploring EFL teachers' beliefs and practices of formative assessment in Chinese context.

Wanrong Lei, Zhibin Lei

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Wanrong LeiSchool of Foreign Languages, Hunan First Normal University, Changsha, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5658-4525
Zhibin LeiSchool of Foreign Languages, Hunan First Normal University, Changsha, China.

Funding

Hunan Provincial Department of Education HNJG-20231361
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Formative assessment (FA) has become central to effective EFL pedagogy, promoting feedback, engagement, and self-regulated learning. Yet in the Chinese EFL context, little is known about how university teachers actually conceptualize and enact FA in their classrooms. This study explores EFL teachers' beliefs, self-reported practices, and challenges in implementing FA through a mixed-methods design that combines a survey (N = 288) with follow-up interviews (n = 11). Results revealed that most teachers hold positive beliefs about FA and acknowledge its potential to enhance student motivation and engagement. However, the frequency of FA practices varies significantly among the participants. Teachers tend to select their FA strategies within institutional limits and rely on technological platforms for implementing these strategies. Despite acknowledging FA's role in informing teaching improvements and student learning, it was frequently used for grading and managing classroom participation. Challenges included time constraints, large class sizes, inadequate technological support, difficulty in establishing clear assessment criteria, and underutilization of self- and peer assessment. These findings highlight the necessity for multifaceted interventions to better align EFL teachers' beliefs with their practices in FA.

Indexed as

Educational MeasurementFacultySchool TeachersAdultChinaFemaleHumansLearningMaleMiddle AgedStudentsSurveys and QuestionnairesTeaching

Identifiers

PMID41021623
PMCPMC12478959

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.