ArticlePloS one2025
New estimates of the costs of adverse events in patients with cancer.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cost-Effectiveness of First-Line Immunochemotherapy VersusCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026Article
- Perioperative immunotherapy for advanced resectable melanoma: a cost-effectiveness analysis.BMC health services research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The cost of adverse events (AEs) is a critical component of healthcare economic models for cancer treatment; however, few comprehensive estimates of these costs exist. Previous studies focused on costs related to specific AEs, cancer types, or treatment regimens. This study assesses the incremental costs of AEs across 13 cancer types by applying the most current diagnosis schema (International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems [ICD-10]) to patients diagnosed between 2016 and 2022. Data were acquired from US insurance claims and included adult patients who were diagnosed and treated for breast, pancreatic, bladder, lung, prostate, colorectal, skin, liver, head and neck, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, follicular lymphoma, multiple myeloma, or chronic lymphocytic leukemia cancer. We selected 54 AEs for analysis based on their frequency of occurrence, relevance based on severity, and availability of ICD-10 diagnostic codes. We matched patient treatment episodes (the period from initiation of a distinct treatment regimen until discontinuation, change of treatment, or end of data availability) for patients experiencing a specific AE to treatment episodes of similar patients not experiencing that same AE in a 1:1 ratio. We generated estimates for AEs of any severity, severe AEs, and individual tumor types. Our analyses evaluate 392,566 treatment episodes from 110,791 patients. In pooled analyses across tumor types, incremental costs for AEs of any severity (with ≥ 100 treatment episodes) ranged from - $488 for photosensitivity to $29,331 for allergic reaction. Incremental costs for severe AEs (with ≥ 50 treatment episodes) ranged from $16 for dizziness to $18,841 for gastrointestinal bleeding. This study provides a comprehensive assessment of the economic burden of AEs in cancer care and generates a range of estimates to be used as inputs in future economic models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.