ArticlePloS one2025
Estimating heterogeneous impacts Of subsidised health insurance: A causal machine learning approach.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The evaluation of social and health policies often necessitates understanding the variations in impacts based on recipients' observed characteristics, underscoring the value of estimating treatment effect heterogeneity. In this study, we leverage predictive and causal machine learning to assess the impact of the subsidised component of Indonesia's National Health Insurance Programme ("JKN") on healthcare utilisation in 2017. We employ causal forests for estimating heterogeneous treatment effects and the super learner algorithm for prediction tasks. Our approach addresses the prevalence of zeros in the utilisation outcomes through a two-part model, which separates the outcome model into zero and non-zero counts. This allows for distinct investigation of policy impacts on the decision to seek care and the quantity of care consumed. We interpret and summarise treatment effect heterogeneity using various approaches, including data-driven subgroup analyses and linear projections, which are grounded in theory. Our results demonstrate a positive average impact on healthcare demand with evident heterogeneity; for instance, the increase in demand varies among recipients. We also find that the effect is modified by a set of theoretically motivated covariates and those identified through our data-driven approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.